9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
The judgment involves the deduction of amount paid to employees under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme and the allowance of the amount claimed as monetary value of unavailed leave in computing the total income of the assessee. Deduction of Amount Paid under Voluntary Retirement Scheme: The Income-tax Officer disallowed the claim for deduction of the sum of Rs. 10,00,803 paid under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme for the assessment year 1976-77. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the deduction, which was upheld by the Tribunal based on earlier orders in the assessee's case and in the case of George Oakes Ltd. The court considered the expenditure incurred for voluntary retirement as pertaining to business considerations and expediency, ultimately concluding that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business, following the decision in Sassoon J. David and Co. P. Ltd. v. CIT [1979] 118 ITR 261. The court also cited a similar decision in CIT v. Sri Ramavilas Service Ltd. Based on these precedents, the court answered question No. 1 in the affirmative and against the Department. Allowance of Monetary Value of Unavailed Leave: Question No. 2 regarding the allowance of the amount claimed as monetary value of unavailed leave was not pressed by the Department. Therefore, the judgment focused on question No. 1 related to the deduction of the amount paid under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme. The court's decision on this issue was based on the principles of business expenditure and the purpose of maintaining good relationship with labor, as established in previous rulings and the Supreme Court decision in Sassoon J. David and Co. P. Ltd. v. CIT [1979] 118 ITR 261. The court did not award any costs in this matter.
|
