9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of whether a show-cause notice received from the Central Excise Department can be equated with a demand notice for the purpose of allowing a claim of excise duty deduction amounting to Rs. 46,86,431 under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Details of the Judgment: Issue 1: Claim of Excise Duty Deduction The assessee, a limited company in the textile manufacturing business, claimed a deduction of Rs. 46,86,431 as excise duty based on show-cause-cum-demand notices received during the relevant previous year. The Income-tax Officer found that the show-cause notice did not create a liability, as the assessee neither accepted nor paid any amount mentioned in the notice. The claim for deduction was rejected by the Income-tax Officer, Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), and the Tribunal. The court held that no actual liability existed, and the amount in question was a contingent liability, not deductible for income tax purposes. Issue 2: Interpretation of Liability The court emphasized that expenditure deductible for income tax must be towards a liability existing in the year of account. Contingent liabilities are not deductible, and the distinction between present liability and future contingent liability is crucial. The court cited precedents to establish that a liability must be accrued and enforceable to be deductible. In this case, the show-cause notice did not result in any actual liability against the assessee, and the amount was treated as a contingent liability in the accounts. Conclusion: The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the show-cause notice did not create an accrued liability for the assessee, and therefore, the deduction claimed for excise duty was not allowable under the Income-tax Act. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.
|
