Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2014 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (9) TMI 997 - AT - Customs


Issues involved:
Classification of products under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 19019090 or CTH 21069099, imposition of penalties under Sections 114A, 14AA, 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, invocation of extended period, eligibility for benefit of Notifications No. 75/2005-Cus and 2/2011-CE, waiver of pre-deposit, stay of recovery during appeal.

Classification of products under CTH 19019090 or CTH 21069099:
The appeal challenged the order confirming a Customs duty demand on the appellant for classifying the products "Mama's Best India Chocolate" under CTH 21069099 instead of CTH 19019090. The appellant argued that since the product primarily consists of skim milk powder, it should be classified under CTH 19019090 as a food preparation not containing cocoa. The appellant contended that CTH 1901 was more specific to the goods compared to CTH 2106, which is a residuary entry for food preparations not elsewhere specified. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument and granted unconditional waiver from pre-deposit and stayed recovery during the appeal for both the main appellant and the co-appellant, the Clearing House Agent (CHA).

Imposition of penalties under Customs Act:
The adjudicating authority had imposed penalties under Sections 114A, 14AA, 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant challenged these penalties, arguing that there was no mis-declaration as all ingredients were clearly declared on the packages. The Tribunal considered the submissions and granted waiver of pre-deposit, indicating that the appellant had made a strong case for the same.

Invocation of extended period and eligibility for benefit of Notifications:
The appellant contested the invocation of the extended period, claiming it was unwarranted as the goods had passed through Customs and all ingredients were declared. Additionally, the appellant argued for the benefit of Notifications No. 75/2005-Cus and 2/2011-CE, stating that even if the product fell under CTH 2106, they would be eligible for concessional duty benefits due to the product's origin and nature. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's contentions and granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during the appeal process.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting unconditional waiver from pre-deposit and staying recovery of the dues during the pendency of the appeal for both the main appellant and the co-appellant. The decision was based on the classification of the products under CTH 19019090, the eligibility for concessional duty benefits, and the absence of mis-declaration on the part of the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates