9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved: Determination of whether the expenditure incurred on replacing parts of wooden trolleys with stainless steel trolleys constitutes revenue expenditure or capital expenditure.
Summary: The High Court of Gujarat, in a case referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, considered the question of whether the expenditure of Rs. 23,323 for replacing parts of wooden trolleys with stainless steel trolleys should be treated as revenue or capital expenditure. The assessee had claimed the cost of replacement as a deduction, arguing it was revenue expenditure. The Income-tax Officer disagreed, deeming it capital in nature, a decision upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) but overturned by the Tribunal. The Tribunal allowed the expenses as allowable expenditure, noting that only parts, not the entire trolley, were replaced during the year. The Court observed that the characterization of such expenditure is a question of fact, and found that the Tribunal correctly applied legal principles to determine the nature of the expenditure in the present case. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding the replacement of parts as revenue expenditure. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.
|
