9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment addresses the interpretation and application of section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in relation to a circular issued under section 84, which was later omitted. The key questions revolve around the correctness of following the circular in granting relief under section 80J and the applicability of the circular to the new provisions. Issue 1: Correct Interpretation of Section 80J(4)(ii) and Circular Application The Tribunal examined whether the circular issued under section 84 could be applied to section 80J, considering the similarity between the provisions. It was held that the circular's benefit must be extended to the assessee under section 80J, as the two sections are materially alike, and any circular benefiting the assessee should be followed by the departmental officers. Issue 2: Replacement of Section 84 by Section 80J Section 84, which provided for tax benefits to industrial undertakings, was replaced by section 80J. The new section allowed for deductions based on the capital employed in the business, with provisions for carry-forward of any deficiency in tax holiday benefits. The judgment clarifies that the purpose and object of both sections were the same, and the circular issued under section 84 remains applicable to section 80J. Issue 3: Binding Nature of Circular and Interpretation The judgment delves into the binding nature of circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. It emphasizes that officers must adhere to such circulars, and in this case, the circular's applicability to section 80J is upheld based on the similarity and intent of the replaced provisions. In conclusion, the High Court of Calcutta upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming the applicability of the circular issued under section 84 to the assessment under section 80J. The judgment clarifies the continuity of benefits and interpretations between the replaced sections, emphasizing the binding nature of beneficial circulars on the assessing authorities.
|
