Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (6) TMI 780 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves issues related to deduction u/s 80IC on other income, eligibility of job work charges for deduction u/s 80IC, and deletion of addition made on account of capitalization of expenses.

Deduction u/s 80IC on Other Income:
The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh heard cross appeals against the Commissioner of Income-tax(A)'s order for assessment year 2007-08 u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The assessee contested the denial of deduction u/s 80IC for 'Other Income' of Rs. 14,36,998, arguing that it was not an independent source of income and should be eligible for the deduction. The Revenue challenged the deletion of additions made on account of coolant, PVC compound, and capitalization of expenses. The Tribunal considered whether the income derived from manufacturing activities was eligible for the deduction u/s 80IC, following precedents set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and previous Tribunal decisions.

Eligibility of Job Work Charges for Deduction u/s 80IC:
In a separate issue, the Tribunal addressed the allowance of deduction u/s 80IC on job work charges. The Assessing Officer initially disallowed the claim, but the CIT(A) allowed it based on previous Tribunal decisions and Supreme Court rulings. The Tribunal noted that the issue had been previously decided in favor of the assessee, and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision based on consistency with earlier judgments.

Deletion of Addition on Capitalization of Expenses:
Regarding the deletion of an addition made on account of capitalization of expenses, the Tribunal examined an expenditure of Rs. 7,07,223 on building repairs, of which Rs. 6,41,303 was capitalized by the Assessing Officer. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's explanation that the expenses were for current repairs and maintenance, not enduring in nature. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, ruling that the expenditure qualified as current repairs under section 30(a)(ii) of the Act, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

This comprehensive summary outlines the key issues addressed in the judgment, detailing the arguments presented, legal interpretations applied, and final decisions made by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates