Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2012 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (2) TMI 537 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty u/s Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 based on denial of credit of service tax paid by service provider for after sales service during warranty period.

Summary:
The applicant filed an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 2,59,72,450, interest, and penalty, as the demand was confirmed due to denial of credit of service tax paid by the service provider for providing after sales service during the warranty period. The main contention was whether the after sales service activity could be considered as an input service, as the credit was denied on the basis that it was a post-manufacturing activity.

The applicant argued that the after sales service activity was part of their contractual obligation with the customer and should be considered as an input service, falling within the definition provided under Rule 2(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. They cited precedents where similar demands were contested and pre-deposit was waived by the Tribunal and High Court.

On the other hand, the Revenue contended that since the TVs were already manufactured and cleared before the service tax was paid by the service provider, the activity could not be classified as an input service.

After considering the arguments, the Tribunal found that the applicant, being the recipient of the taxable service, had a strong case for waiver of pre-deposit based on the definition of input service provided in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Therefore, the pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty was waived, and recovery was stayed during the appeal process. The stay petition was allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates