The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, ...

Taxpayer Wins Appeal as Tribunal Orders Comprehensive Review of Tax Assessment and CIT(A)'s Non-Speaking Order

April 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case for re-examination. The tribunal found merit in the assessee's arguments that the CIT(A) passed a non-speaking order without thoroughly examining the case merits. Referencing the Supreme Court's guidance in AUDA's case, the tribunal emphasized the tax authorities' obligation to carefully scrutinize receipts, expenditure patterns, and contentions on a case-by-case basis. The order specifically noted the CIT(A)'s failure to consider the assessee's detailed submissions regarding the TV subsidy received from BCCI and the impact of registration cancellation under section 12A.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, ...

Taxpayer Wins Appeal as Tribunal Orders Comprehensive Review of Tax Assessment and CIT(A)'s Non-Speaking Order

April 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

HC allowed petition challenging tax determination order under GST Act. The court found the proper officer erroneously dismissed the taxpayer's rectification application...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

The High Court reviewed an assessment order challenged for being unreasoned. The Court found that the order lacked proper reasoning as it confirmed the tax proposal...

Non-speaking order - Refund of the differential duty - by not issuing the speaking orders or giving any reply to their requests for speaking order, the officer has...

HC determined that typographical error in address on notice under s.148 of IT Act does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. Taxpayer's claim for India-Singapore DTAA...

Finalization of provisional assessment - The authorities below have erred in collecting the Duty at ₹ 300/- per M.T., which is clearly illegal and in violation of...

Non-speaking order - It is clear that the order of Tribunal is certainly a non-speaking order and the Tribunal failed to consider the grounds raised by the appellant....

Non-speaking order - Once the litigant before the Tribunal placed reliance upon the decision of the a coordinate Bench of the Tribunal, then a speaking order would...

Validity of review order - Period of limitation - It cannot be understood what prevented the Department from submitting before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the...

Validity of order u/s 119(2)(b) - Rejection of request for Condonation of delay in filing of Income Tax Return (ITR) - Non speaking order - This Court finds that the...

HC examined proceedings under Section 73 of UP GST Act regarding disputed input tax credit claims. The authority initially rejected certificates filed per Government...

Challenge to non-speaking order of assessment and consequential rectification order. Order passed without considering objections, violating principles of natural justice....

Quick Updates: