ITAT adjudicated a taxation dispute concerning penalty levy ...

Computational Errors in Tax Assessment Do Not Constitute Underreported Income, Tribunal Clarifies Section 270A Penalty Provisions

April 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT adjudicated a taxation dispute concerning penalty levy under section 270A. The tribunal examined whether disallowed expenses constituted underreported income. Key findings indicate that adjustments made under section 143(1)(a) involving apparent computational mistakes do not qualify as underreported income warranting penalty. The tribunal distinguished between inadvertent computational errors and deliberate income misreporting. Specifically, additions made during assessment that stem from apparent mistakes are exempt from penalty provisions. The tribunal interpreted section 270A(2)(a) narrowly, holding that only income determined through scrutiny assessment can be classified as underreported. Consequently, the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, negating penalty imposition and emphasizing legislative intent to exclude inadvertent computational errors from punitive taxation measures.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT adjudicated a taxation dispute concerning penalty levy ...

Computational Errors in Tax Assessment Do Not Constitute Underreported Income, Tribunal Clarifies Section 270A Penalty Provisions

April 14, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

Penalty proceedings u/s. 270A for underreporting of income - claim of excessive loss - Since, the assessee has neither claimed any benefit of loss against any other...

Validity of assessment - Jurisdiction - An irregularity in the assessment order may be rectified by remitting back the matter to the assessment. In the case on hand it...

The summary highlights the key difference between the scope of total income under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and...

Delay of 1154 days in filing appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not condoned as reasons given, such as leaving income tax matters in hands of...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - CIRP proceedings - The proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) cannot be pressed into service to...

The ITAT set aside the assessment order under section 147, holding that the AO failed to comply with mandatory conditions under sections 147-151A. Regarding...

The assessee company is eligible to claim Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) against its Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) liability u/s 115JB of the Income Tax Act for taxes paid in...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue Department against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld...

The case involved penalty proceedings u/s 270A for under-reporting or misreporting of income. The appellant argued that there was no underreporting as the transaction...

The assessee had been following the mercantile system of accounting, wherein book profits are taken for tax assessment, though credit or debit amounts may not be...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Period of limitation - The audit party is entitled to point out a factual error or omission in the assessment. reopening of the...

Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (PAN: AAATD2434P), a body constituted by State Government of Karnataka, is exempted from income tax u/s 10(46) of...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the validity of a revision u/s 263, focusing on the alleged non-consideration of the assessee's submissions by the Principal...

Additional income offered on account of excess stock during the course of survey - business income of the assessee OR income from other sources liable to be taxed at a...

Quick Updates: