Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2014 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (8) TMI 1041 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
1. Validity of transaction in favor of the petitioner challenged due to pending revenue recovery proceedings.
2. Third respondent not issuing possession certificate, location certificate, and location sketch.
3. Contention regarding the applicability of section 26A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.
4. Interpretation of section 529A of the Companies Act in relation to recovery of sales tax dues.

Analysis:

1. The petitioner, a public limited company, purchased a property from a company in liquidation as per the Companies Act, 1956. The sale was confirmed by the Court, and the official liquidator executed the sale deed in favor of the petitioner. However, challenges arose when the petitioner sought certificates for establishing an industrial unit, as the third respondent raised concerns about pending revenue recovery proceedings against the company in liquidation, questioning the validity of the transaction.

2. The third respondent refused to issue the required certificates and instead issued a communication citing the pending revenue recovery proceedings against the company in liquidation for sales tax dues. The petitioner challenged this communication, seeking directions for the issuance of the certificates. Respondents 2 and 3 contended that the sale deed obtained by the petitioner was affected by section 26A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, making it not binding on the State due to the pending dues.

3. The petitioner argued that sales tax dues are to be recovered from the sale proceeds as per section 529A of the Companies Act, prioritizing workmen's dues and debts due to secured creditors. The petitioner relied on a previous Division Bench decision where a similar situation was addressed, emphasizing that section 26A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act cannot supersede the mandates of section 529A of the Companies Act.

4. The Court examined the previous decision's relevance to the current case, noting that while section 26B of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was addressed in the previous case, the present case involved section 26A. The Court reiterated that section 26A, like section 26B, cannot prevail when conflicting with section 529A of the Companies Act, which dictates the priority of debt payments in a company's winding-up process. Consequently, the Court held in favor of the petitioner, quashing the communication from the third respondent and directing the issuance of the certificates requested by the petitioner within a specified timeframe.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates