9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal against order of CIT(A)-XVIII, New Delhi dated 20th April, 2011 for AY 2008-09 regarding deletion of addition made u/s 14A and application of Rule 8D for disallowance.
Issue 1: Deletion of addition u/s 14A The Revenue appealed against the deletion of addition of Rs. 14,43,248/- u/s 14A out of total addition of Rs. 1,62,73,596/-. The CIT(A) allowed relief of Rs. 14,43,248/- and confirmed the addition of Rs. 1,44,80,996/- under Section 14A. However, the CIT(A) found that the disallowance of Rs. 17,19,600/- for administrative expenses exceeded the total expenditure of Rs. 2,76,352/- incurred by the assessee. The CIT(A) held that any disallowance exceeding the actual expenditure incurred is not warranted under the law. Therefore, the disallowance in respect of administrative expenses was restricted to Rs. 2,76,352/- and the balance of Rs. 14,43,248/- was deleted. Issue 2: Application of Rule 8D The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the disallowance was made by applying Rule 8D, which was mandatory for the Assessing Officer. However, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the total administrative expenses claimed by the assessee were only Rs. 2,76,352/-, and any disallowance cannot exceed the actual expenditure claimed. Therefore, the reduction of disallowance from Rs. 17,19,600/- to Rs. 2,76,352/- by the CIT(A) was deemed appropriate. In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the appeal of the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)'s order regarding the deletion of the addition made u/s 14A and the application of Rule 8D for disallowance. The decision was pronounced in the open Court on 9th August, 2012.
|
