9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The issue involves the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income-tax to initiate proceedings u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act and revise the original assessment order when the original order was rectified before the initiation of proceedings. Comprehensive Details of the Judgment: Jurisdiction to Initiate Proceedings u/s 263: The case involved a private limited company assessed for the year 1979-80, where the original assessment was completed on March 30, 1982, and later rectified on May 6, 1983. The Commissioner of Income-tax found the original assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue, initiating proceedings u/s 263 on March 2, 1984. However, the order of rectification was overturned on appeal on January 30, 1985. The Tribunal remanded the case to the Income-tax Officer for redetermination, leading to the question of whether the Commissioner had the jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under section 263 when the original order was not in existence at the time of initiation. Legal Analysis: The Court referred to Section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, which empowers the Commissioner to revise orders prejudicial to Revenue. The Court emphasized that the Commissioner's power under this section is based on the existence of an erroneous order. In this case, on the date of initiation of proceedings on March 2, 1984, the original order dated March 30, 1982, had been superseded by the order of rectification on May 6, 1983. The subsequent overturning of the rectification order did not validate the invalidity present in the original order at the time of initiation. Legal Precedent: The Court cited the case of Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner, emphasizing that the validity of an order must be judged based on the reasons mentioned at the time of the order and cannot be supplemented by later reasons. Therefore, the Court concluded that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings u/s 263 when the original order was not in existence, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department. Conclusion: The Court held that the Tribunal was not justified in upholding the Commissioner's jurisdiction in initiating proceedings under section 263 when the original order had been rectified. The Court directed that appropriate proceedings could be taken with reference to the original order dated March 30, 1982. The case was disposed of without costs, and a copy of the order was to be transmitted to the Tribunal. This judgment clarifies the importance of the existence of the original order at the time of initiating revision proceedings under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, ensuring that statutory functions are exercised within the legal framework.
|
