9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (3) TMI 508 - AT - Income TaxRectification of mistake - MAT computation provision applicability - Held that - Just because a retrospective amendment has been carried out on the statue, the assessment cannot be modified without examining whether the provisions so made are to be disallowed or not. This requires detailed examination and in fact as for the submissions made before the authorities, the assessee had appeared before the Assessing Officer furnishing various details and how the amounts cannot be disallowed. Since this requires elaborate examination on a long run process, we are of the opinion that the orders cannot be modified by invoking the provisions of section 154. Not only that the Coordinate Bench in assessee s own case in assessment year 2006-07 has held that the provisions of section 115JB are not applicable to the assessee Bank. In view of this, we hold that the order under section 154 passed by the Assessing Officer is not correct and therefore, the same was set aside. Accordingly assessee s grounds in the above 2 years are allowed.
Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Rule 8D in assessment years 2002-03 to 2006-07. 2. Disallowance of provisions for wage arrears and others under section 115JB for assessment years 2004-05 & 2005-06. 3. Applicability of section 115JB to a banking company. 4. Invocation of section 154 for modifying book profits under section 115JB retrospectively. Analysis: 1. Applicability of Rule 8D (Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-07): The appellant withdrew appeals for these years as the ITAT previously held in a different case that Rule 8D is not applicable. These appeals were allowed to be withdrawn without objection. 2. Disallowance of Provisions under Section 115JB (Assessment Years 2004-05 & 2005-06): The Assessing Officer modified book profits under section 115JB by disallowing provisions for wage arrears, others, etc., due to a retrospective amendment. The appellant contended that these provisions were not unascertained liabilities and should not be disallowed under section 154. The CIT (A) upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer. However, the ITAT found that the Assessing Officer's actions were not correct as the provisions of section 115JB were not applicable to the appellant bank. The orders modifying book profits were set aside, and the appeals for these years were allowed. 3. Applicability of Section 115JB to a Banking Company: The appellant argued that section 115JB was not applicable to the banking company based on previous judgments and the nature of the provisions in question. The ITAT agreed with the appellant's contentions and held that the provisions of section 115JB were not applicable to the banking company. 4. Invocation of Section 154 Retrospectively: The Assessing Officer invoked section 154 to modify book profits under section 115JB retrospectively. The ITAT found that such modifications without detailed examination and considering previous judgments were not correct. The orders passed under section 154 were set aside as the provisions of section 115JB were not applicable to the appellant. The appeals for these years were allowed, and the orders modifying book profits were deemed redundant. In conclusion, the ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeals for assessment years 2004-05 & 2005-06, as the provisions of section 115JB were found not applicable to the appellant banking company. The ITAT also set aside the orders passed under section 154 for modifying book profits retrospectively, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination before such modifications.
|
