2011 (8) TMI 1200 - SC - Indian Laws

Summary

Issues involved: Delay in filing special leave petition, condonation of delay, exercise of power under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

The Supreme Court judgment pertains to a petition challenging the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which dismissed the revision filed against the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order. The petitioner sought condonation of a 233-day delay in filing the special leave petition. The Court considered the explanation provided by the petitioner for the delay, which included being abroad, family commitments, and health issues. However, the Court found the reasons unsatisfactory as the petitioner was aware of the order within a fortnight, yet failed to take necessary steps for filing the petition promptly. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the prescribed limitation period, especially in consumer matters, to ensure expeditious resolution of disputes. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was rejected, and the special leave petition was dismissed as time-barred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.