Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2002 (12) TMI 625 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Challenge to order disallowing modvat credit on furnace oil used in manufacturing exempted and dutiable goods.

Analysis:
1. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing various goods, challenged the order disallowing modvat credit on furnace oil used during a specific period due to the inputs being used in the manufacture of exempted and nil-rated duty goods.

2. The appellant contended that they had already debited the modvat credit on furnace oil used for purposes other than manufacturing dutiable final products, citing an amendment to Rule 57C which allowed credit in respect of inputs used for various purposes within the factory of production.

3. The main contention revolved around the interpretation of the phrase "for any other purpose," with the appellant arguing that it includes processes related to the production of exempted or nil-rated duty goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) did not accept this argument entirely but allowed modvat credit on furnace oil used in producing dutiable final products.

4. The appellant relied on a previous Tribunal decision to support their case, where it was established that when common inputs are used for manufacturing both duty paid and exempted goods, a specific provision exempted fuel inputs from reversal of modvat credit or payment of duty. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument that inputs used for generating electricity or steam for manufacturing non-dutiable items fall under the term "for any other purpose within the factory of production."

5. Consequently, the Tribunal modified the order to allow the appellant to retain the modvat credit on furnace oil used after a specified date, holding that the appellant was not liable to reverse the credit. The appeal was allowed based on this interpretation of the relevant rules and provisions.

This detailed analysis highlights the key contentions, legal interpretations, and precedents considered in the judgment regarding the challenge to the disallowance of modvat credit on furnace oil used in manufacturing both exempted and dutiable goods.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates