9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of gift-tax liability in the case of a change in the constitution of a firm. 2. Determination of whether the firm had goodwill and if the introduction of a new partner constituted a gift. Analysis: The High Court of Madhya Pradesh addressed a reference under section 26 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, concerning a dispute arising from a change in the firm's constitution. The respondent, holding a 60% share in the firm, saw a reduction in their share to 40% due to the induction of a new partner. The Gift-tax Officer contended that the introduction of the third partner amounted to a gift by the respondent of 20% shares and taxed a portion of the firm's goodwill accordingly. However, the Assistant Commissioner of Gift-tax overturned this decision, stating that there was no goodwill in the firm, leading to the allowance of the respondent's appeal. Upon appeal by the Revenue to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal noted conflicting views of High Courts on the existence of goodwill in a business. Despite this, the Tribunal upheld the first appellate court's decision, emphasizing that in cases of divergence, the view favoring the assessee should be adopted. The Tribunal, therefore, dismissed the Revenue's appeal and confirmed the absence of goodwill in the firm, relieving the assessee from gift-tax liability. The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's reasoning, highlighting that the absence of goodwill in the firm was a factual finding supported by the specific nature of the business involving common articles like glass-sheets. Acknowledging the differing perspectives on goodwill across High Courts, the Court endorsed the Tribunal's approach of adopting the more reasonable view in favor of the assessee. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling that the firm had no goodwill, and the assessee was not liable to pay gift-tax. The reference was answered in favor of the assessee.
|
