9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of provisions u/s 142A and 131(1)(d) in relation to assessment proceedings.
Summary: The appeals arose from a Tribunal judgment regarding assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96, questioning the application of s. 142A despite the assessment order being passed before 30th Sept., 2004. The assessee's returns were filed in July 1995, and after no action under s. 143(1)(a), the AO issued a notice under s. 148 in Oct. 1996 based on a valuation report indicating income escapement. The CIT(A) set aside the assessment, citing relevant case laws, which the Tribunal upheld. The Revenue argued that s. 131(1)(d) allows obtaining valuation reports even if no assessment proceedings are pending. However, the Tribunal found that the assessment was completed under s. 143(1)(a) due to the expiry of time for issuing s. 143(2) notice, leading to the initiation of proceedings under s. 147 post-assessment. The AO's reason to believe income escapement was solely based on the valuation report obtained under s. 131(1)(d). Referring to a Supreme Court case, the Court held that s. 131(1)(d) does not empower the AO to refer matters to the Valuation Officer. Despite the introduction of s. 142A in 2004, it has limitations and cannot be applied retrospectively to finalized assessments before Sept. 30, 2004. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeals as the provisions of s. 142A could not be invoked in this case based on the existing legal framework and the specific circumstances of the assessment proceedings.
|
