9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act. 2. Application of the doctrine of merger in income-tax proceedings. Analysis: The judgment pertains to a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner under section 263. The issue at hand was whether the Commissioner could invoke section 263 for items not adjudicated by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The case involved additions made to the income of an assessee firm after a search at its premises, with specific challenges to three additions. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) adjudicated on two additions but not on the third, as the assessee did not contest it. Subsequently, the Commissioner invoked section 263, citing the failure of the Income-tax Officer to investigate certain aspects. The Tribunal held that the Commissioner could not use section 263 for items not addressed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) since the order of the Income-tax Officer ceased to exist post-appeal. However, the Revenue challenged this decision, citing a precedent where a Special Bench of five judges held that the doctrine of merger applies to income-tax proceedings but its extent depends on the appeal's scope. The Tribunal's decision was deemed invalid based on this precedent. The Special Bench's ruling clarified that the Commissioner can revise an order under section 263 if the Appellate Assistant Commissioner did not address a specific matter within the appeal's purview. If the Commissioner sets aside the entire assessment order, he cannot revise it under section 263. Therefore, the Tribunal's decision was overturned, and the reference was answered in favor of the Revenue, allowing the Commissioner to exercise jurisdiction under section 263 for unaddressed items.
|
