9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Interest on term deposit assessed as income from other sources. 2. Net receipt of interest should be taken into account. 3. Foreign exchange rate difference on opening debtors. 4. Deduction u/s 10A in respect of sale of scrap. 5. Disallowance of software expenses as capital expenditure. 6. Computation of book profit u/s 115JB. 7. Increasing book profits by the amount of provision of leave encashment. Summary: Issue 1: Interest on Term Deposit The assessee, a private limited company engaged in the call center business, claimed deduction u/s 10A of Rs. 47,54,672/-. The assessee received interest income on term deposits of Rs. 28,20,208/- and claimed that this should be treated as part of eligible profit for deduction u/s 10A. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the interest income as income from other sources. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the interest income was not derived from the actual conduct of business of the undertaking. The Tribunal, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Liberty India, held that interest earned on surplus funds deposited in the bank does not come under the first degree of source of profit derived from the business of the undertaking. Thus, this issue was decided against the assessee. Issue 2: Net Receipt of Interest The assessee argued that the net receipt of interest (interest received minus interest paid) should be considered. The Tribunal noted that the fixed deposits were not made in connection with the business activity or requirement of the business but were surplus funds. Therefore, the interest earned had no direct nexus with the business expenditure, and the claim of netting of interest was not allowed. The Tribunal cited the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT vs Asian Star Co Ltd, which emphasized that deductions must comply with the provisions enacted by Parliament. This issue was also decided against the assessee. Issue 3: Foreign Exchange Rate Difference The assessee did not press the common ground regarding the foreign exchange rate difference on opening debtors. Consequently, this ground was dismissed as not pressed. Issue 4: Deduction u/s 10A in Respect of Sale of Scrap The assessee did not press the ground regarding deduction u/s 10A in respect of the sale of scrap of Rs. 11,944/-. This ground was dismissed as not pressed. Issue 5: Disallowance of Software Expenses The assessee did not press the ground regarding the disallowance of software expenses to the extent of Rs. 34,37,478/- as capital expenditure. This ground was dismissed as not pressed. Issue 6: Computation of Book Profit u/s 115JB The assessee did not press the ground regarding the computation of book profit u/s 115JB of the Act, where an amount of Rs. 76,99,25,000/- ought to have been reduced under clause (ii) of the Explanation to sec. 115JB. This ground was dismissed as not pressed. Issue 7: Increasing Book Profits by Provision of Leave Encashment The assessee did not press the ground regarding the increase in book profits by the amount of provision of leave encashment of Rs. 26,39,000/-. This ground was dismissed as not pressed. Conclusion: The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities on all contested issues. The order was pronounced on the 12th day of August 2011.
|
