Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (3) TMI 1689 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved: The judgment involves the deletion of an addition made on a protective basis by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding unexplained cash found in possession of an employee of M/s SAS Servizio Ltd.

Details of Judgment:

Issue 1: Addition of 50,00,000/- made on protective basis
The Assessing Officer concluded that the cash of 50,00,000/- found with the employee belonged to M/s SAS Servizio Ltd. and was unexplained income. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted this addition, stating that the company had accepted that the cash belonged to them twice, during the survey and assessment proceedings. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that since the company had acknowledged the cash as theirs, there was no need for the addition in the employee's hands on a protective basis.

Key Phrases:
- Addition made on protective basis
- Unexplained cash found in possession
- Company accepted cash belonged to them
- Assessing Officer's conclusion
- Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision
- Tribunal's decision

Significant Sentences:
- "Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition of 50,00,000/- made on protective basis which represented unexplained cash of M/s SAS Servizio Ltd. of whom the assessee was an employee."
- "The Assessing Officer concluded that the cash amounting to 50,00,000/- remains unexplained and represents income which has not or would not have been disclosed for the purpose of Income tax."
- "The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that the addition of 50 lacs in the hands of the appellant on protective basis is bad in law and is hereby deleted."
- "The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) stating that since the company had acknowledged the cash as theirs, there was no need for the addition in the employee's hands on a protective basis."

Judge's Name: Not Applicable.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates