9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether losses on shares and securities can be deducted from the income for income tax purposes. 2. Determining if the activities of the assessee constitute a business or investment. Analysis: 1. The assessee sought to deduct losses of Rs. 60,000 from the liquidation of Tinnevelly Textiles Limited and Rs. 4,912 from the purchase and sale of Government Promissory Notes from the income for income tax purposes. The Income Tax Officer and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax held that these losses were capital losses and could not be allowed as deductions. The Assistant Commissioner found that the assessee did not carry on a business of purchasing and selling shares or Government securities, but rather invested capital for earning dividends and interest. The Assistant Commissioner concluded that the losses were not allowable deductions as they were capital losses, not business losses. The Court upheld this finding, emphasizing the distinction between capital gains and business profits for income tax purposes. 2. The definition of "business" under Section 2(4) of the Income Tax Act includes trade, commerce, or any adventure in the nature of trade. The Act does not apply to receipts of a casual and non-recurring nature. The Court noted that profits or losses from sales of securities or shares could be considered casual and non-recurring or part of a business. The intention behind the purchase of securities is crucial in determining whether it constitutes a business activity or investment. If a person engages in numerous purchases and sales within a short time, it indicates speculation, while few sales over long intervals suggest investment. The Court found that the Assistant Commissioner did not err in concluding that the assessee's activities were not a business of speculation but rather capital investment. Therefore, the Court dismissed the application, upholding the Assistant Commissioner's decision not to allow the deduction of losses from the income for income tax purposes. In conclusion, the judgment clarified the distinction between capital investment and business activities for income tax purposes. It emphasized the importance of intention behind securities transactions in determining whether they constitute a business or investment. The Court upheld the decision that the assessee's losses were capital losses and not allowable deductions for income tax purposes.
|
