9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to exemptions under sections 54 and 54(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Entitlement to exemption under section 54(2) in view of the construction and remodelling of an existing building. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Entitlement to Exemptions under Sections 54 and 54(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961: The Tribunal granted the assessee's claim for exemption under sections 54 and 54(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating to the computation of capital gains. The assessee purchased a property on May 14, 1975, and another property was acquired on May 4, 1976, with compensation received on August 17, 1976. Enhanced compensation was awarded on November 1, 1978, and received on October 27, 1980. The Income-tax Officer held that the capital gains accrued in the year 1977-78, including the enhanced compensation. The appellate authority upheld this decision, emphasizing the date of transfer rather than the receipt of compensation for applying section 54. The Tribunal examined whether the income could be classified as "income from house property." The court clarified that the term "house property" in section 54 should be understood from the language of the section itself, emphasizing the property's use by the assessee mainly for his own residence. The Tribunal relied on the Madras High Court decision in CIT v. C. Jayalakshmi, which interpreted "mainly" as "principally." The Tribunal found that one-third of the compensation was for the shop, and two-thirds for the residential portion, justifying the assessee's claim for exemption under section 54. 2. Entitlement to Exemption under Section 54(2) in View of the Construction and Remodelling of an Existing Building: The Tribunal addressed whether the construction of a house property for the assessee's residence under section 54(2) required a brand new construction or could include remodelling. The Tribunal noted that the assessee obtained municipal permission for construction, which was completed by December 1980. It rejected the Department's argument that the exemption applied only to new constructions. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee started construction within two years of receiving additional compensation, making him eligible for exemption under section 54(2). The Tribunal's decision was based on the factual matrix, including permission dates and construction timelines, which were undisputed. Conclusion: The Tribunal's findings were upheld, affirming the assessee's entitlement to exemptions under sections 54 and 54(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment was in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue-Department for both questions.
|
