Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (9) TMI 1116 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: The appeal challenges the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for assessment year 2006-07, focusing on jurisdiction u/s 263 and related additions/enhancements.

Jurisdiction u/s 263:
The appeal contests the CIT's assumption of jurisdiction u/s 263, arguing that the original assessment was diligently conducted, and detailed submissions were made. The CIT's decision to enhance income by disallowing TDS on freight charges is challenged, citing failure to consider relevant judgments.

Additions/Enhancements:
The CIT invoked s.263 due to non-deduction of TDS on freight charges, leading to an income enhancement of Rs. 9.45 Cr. The CIT also addressed issues related to Section 40A(3), setting aside the matter for further examination by the AO. The CIT's decision was based on the separate legal status of the Union and truck owners, holding the Union liable for TDS on payments to truck owners.

Legal Precedents:
The judgment references decisions by the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court and the Himachal Pradesh High Court, emphasizing that Section 194C(2) did not apply in cases where the Union acted in a representative capacity. These precedents influenced the decision to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee for freight charges paid to truck operators.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the allowance of the Rs. 9.45 Cr deduction for freight charges. The issues related to Section 40A(3) were dismissed based on the AR's admission. The decision aligned with legal precedents and upheld the original assessment against the CIT's enhancements.

Note: Separate judgments were not delivered by the judges.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates