9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Assessment of loss, penalty proceedings under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961, concealment of income, validity of penalty proceedings.
Assessment of Loss: The assessee filed a return for the assessment year 1990-91 declaring a loss of &8377; 1,92,643. The AO determined the loss to be &8377; 77,640 under section 143(3) of the IT Act, 1961. Subsequently, penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were initiated based on the reduced loss amount. Validity of Penalty Proceedings: The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's claim that no penalty could be imposed, citing a precedent from the High Court. The Revenue appealed to the Tribunal, which upheld the decision. The Revenue further appealed to the High Court challenging the penalty imposition. Concealment of Income: The Revenue contended that the assessee had concealed an income of &8377; 1,15,000, leading to the reduced loss amount determined by the AO. The Revenue argued that even negative income should be considered part of the income, and since the assessee could carry forward the loss, there was concealment of income warranting penalty proceedings. Judgment: The High Court noted that the issue raised in the appeal was settled by a previous judgment of the Court and subsequently affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Court emphasized that once a decision is affirmed by the Supreme Court, it becomes binding. As the Supreme Court had affirmed the earlier decision without providing reasons, the High Court found no grounds to interfere and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue.
|
