Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (3) TMI 1191 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Determination of Permanent Establishment (PE) in India.
2. Tax rate applicable to income received from Indian parties.
3. Deletion of interest levied under section 234B of the Income-tax Act.

Issue 1: Determination of Permanent Establishment (PE) in India

The case involved an assessee registered in Germany providing consulting services in India. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the assessee had a PE in India based on agreements with Indian companies. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) upheld this decision, emphasizing the nature and duration of services provided. However, the Appellate Tribunal disagreed, focusing on the actual stay of employees in India and the nature of services provided. It referenced relevant DTAA provisions and previous case law to conclude that the assessee did not have a PE in India. The Tribunal determined that the income received should be taxed at 10% under Article 12 of the DTAA, rather than the higher rates applied by the AO and FAA.

Issue 2: Tax rate applicable to income received from Indian parties

The AO and FAA had applied higher tax rates under section 115A of the Act to the income received by the assessee from Indian parties. However, the Appellate Tribunal ruled that the income should be taxed at 10% under Article 12 of the DTAA, as the assessee did not have a PE in India. The Tribunal referred to specific provisions of the DTAA and the Protocol to support its decision, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee and against the higher tax rates imposed by the lower authorities.

Issue 3: Deletion of interest levied under section 234B of the Income-tax Act

The AO had levied interest under section 234B of the Act, which was challenged before the FAA. Citing relevant judgments, the FAA ruled in favor of the assessee. The Appellate Tribunal, following the decisions of the Hon'ble High Courts, decided the effective ground of appeal against the Assessing Officer. As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal filed by the AO was dismissed.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal's judgment addressed the determination of PE in India, the applicable tax rates on income received from Indian parties, and the deletion of interest levied under section 234B of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal's detailed analysis, referencing DTAA provisions and legal precedents, resulted in a favorable decision for the assessee on all three issues, providing clarity on the tax treatment of the income in question.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates