9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Penalty imposed under section 273(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Cancelling of penalty by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. 3. Refusal of the Tribunal to refer the question of law to the High Court. 4. Direction by the High Court to refer the question of law. Analysis: Issue 1: The case involved a penalty imposed under section 273(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee had initially filed a return of income, which was accepted by the Income-tax Officer. However, it was later discovered that the assessee had received a significant sum for services rendered, leading to an addition to the income after an enquiry. Issue 2: The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty under section 273(2)(a) on the assessee, who then appealed before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The penalty was upheld on the grounds that the assessee furnished an untrue estimate of advance tax intentionally. However, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal later deleted the addition made to the income, considering it a gift from the employer. Consequently, the Tribunal canceled the penalties as the basis for imposition had been removed in the quantum assessment. Issue 3: The Revenue, dissatisfied with the cancellation of penalties, sought a reference of the question of law to the Tribunal. The Tribunal dismissed the request, stating that the findings were factual and did not raise a question of law, leading to the Revenue's application before the High Court. Issue 4: The High Court, after reviewing the facts and circumstances, directed the Tribunal to refer the question of law to the court, considering that a question of law indeed arose in the case. The High Court's decision was influenced by a previous judgment and order, emphasizing the need for a reference on the quantum appeal, ultimately disposing of the petition. This detailed analysis outlines the progression of events leading to the imposition and subsequent cancellation of the penalty under section 273(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, highlighting the role of various authorities and the final direction by the High Court to refer the question of law for its decision.
|
