9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal against order of ld.CIT(A) cancelling rectification order u/s 154/143(3) for assessment year 2006-07.
Revenue's case: AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) with NIL income, later noticed unclaimed depreciation. AO relied on Jaipuria Chinaclay Mines case for current year's depreciation set off. Appellant argued depreciation not claimed, citing Mahendra Mills Ltd. case. AO allowed depreciation, leading to appeal. Appellant's case: Appellant argued depreciation not claimed, as per Mahendra Mills Ltd. case. AO did not consider submissions, leading to cancellation request. Tribunal found AO's decision not justified, as depreciation not claimed and retrospective application not applicable. Tribunal's decision: Tribunal noted disputable nature of issue, citing Sree Senhavalli Textile Mills and Kerala Electric Lamp Works Ltd. cases. Explanation 5 of Section 32(1) not retrospective, Mahendra Mills Ltd. case applicable. Tribunal upheld ld.CIT(A)'s decision to cancel order u/s 154. Revenue's appeal dismissed.
|
