9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Assessment for the assessment year 1998-99, rectification of assessment under Section 154, jurisdiction of income tax authorities, claim for arrears under Fifth Pay Commission notification.
Assessment for the assessment year 1998-99: The assessee failed to claim arrears payable under a notification related to the Fifth Pay Commission in the return filed for the assessment year 1998-99, leading to the assessment being finalized without the deduction. The Assessing Officer declined rectification, stating there was no rectifiable error, a decision upheld by the CIT(Appeals) and the ITAT. Rectification under Section 154: The assessee applied for rectification of the assessment, but the authorities held that there was no rectifiable error. The High Court observed that the assessee pursued the wrong remedy by seeking rectification, and failed to mention the relevant notification in the return filed. The Court suggested that the assessee should approach the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of the Act for the original assessment order framed in March 2001. Jurisdiction of income tax authorities: The High Court concluded that the question of law regarding the jurisdiction of income tax authorities under Section 154 did not arise in this case. The Court noted that the assessee's failure to disclose the material fact of the notification and the pursuit of wrong remedies led to the current situation, where the assessee was advised to approach the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 for a revision application. Claim for arrears under Fifth Pay Commission notification: The assessee overlooked claiming arrears payable under a notification related to the Fifth Pay Commission in the return filed for the assessment year 1998-99. This omission, along with the pursuit of incorrect remedies, resulted in the need for the assessee to seek redress through a revision application under Section 264 of the Act. The High Court granted liberty to file an application under Section 264 within a month and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
|
