Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2014 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (6) TMI 990 - AT - Customs


Issues:
Revenue's challenge to finding of Commissioner of Customs on Fe content and applicable duty rate under Notification No. 62/2007-Cus.

Analysis:
The Appeals filed by the Revenue challenge the Orders-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata concerning the Fe content of export goods and the applicable duty rate under Notification No. 62/2007-Cus. The Revenue contends that the Fe content of the export goods being less than 62% should attract a duty rate of Rs. 50 per MT as per the notification. The Special Counsel for the Revenue acknowledges that the Commissioner's observation aligns with a previous Supreme Court decision. On the other hand, the Respondent argues that the Orders-in-Appeal are lawful and seeks consequential reliefs.

Upon review of the records, it is established that the Assessee/Respondent exported Iron Ore Fines with Fe content below 62%, as confirmed by Test Reports. This Fe content condition satisfies the requirements of Notification No. 62/2007-Cus. The notification exempts iron ore fines with Fe content 62% and below from excess customs duty when exported. The notification emphasizes the relevance of the export conditions in determining Fe content, rather than the selling price of the goods. Consequently, the Order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is upheld, and the Revenue's Appeals are rejected. However, the matter is remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for the verification and determination of refund claims by the Assessee/Respondent, considering other eligibility conditions. The Adjudicating Authority is directed to decide on the refund claims within three months from the date of communication of the Order.

In conclusion, the judgment affirms the Commissioner's decision on the Fe content of export goods and the applicable duty rate under the relevant notification. The Appeals by the Revenue are dismissed, with the case remanded for the Adjudicating Authority to address the refund claims within a specified timeframe.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates