9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
Whether the assessee-trust can be taxed when one of the beneficiaries has already been assessed as a beneficiary of the trust. Judgment Details: The High Court of Kerala, in a case involving the taxation of an assessee-trust, considered the scenario where one of the beneficiaries had already been assessed. The assessment year in question was 1980-81, and the Income-tax Officer had assessed the income of the property u/s 164(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was noted that the beneficiary, Pramod John Joseph, had been assessed prior to the assessment of the trust. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner initially rejected the contention that the trust cannot be taxed after a beneficiary has been assessed, leading the matter to the Tribunal. The Tribunal referred to circulars emphasizing that once the Department chooses to tax either the trust or the beneficiary, it cannot subsequently assess the other to avoid double taxation. The Tribunal relied on established principles of finality, supported by circulars and judicial precedents, to conclude that the Department cannot reassess the trust after a beneficiary has been assessed. The Tribunal highlighted that attempting to tax the trust post-assessment of the beneficiary would result in double taxation, a practice not permissible under the law. Ultimately, the High Court accepted the reference and upheld the Tribunal's decision that the assessee-trust cannot be taxed since one of the beneficiaries had already been assessed. The judgment directed the Appellate Tribunal to take necessary actions based on this decision. This judgment underscores the importance of avoiding double taxation and upholding the principle of finality in assessments, especially when a beneficiary has already been assessed, preventing the Department from reassessing the trust.
|
