Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (12) TMI 1748 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Appeals by Revenue against CIT(A) orders for different assessment years not exceeding Rs. 10 lacs - Applicability of CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 - Dismissal of appeals and cross objections.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur involved multiple appeals by the Revenue against orders of the ld. CIT(A)s for different assessment years, where the demand/tax effect did not exceed Rs. 10 lacs. The CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015, issued under Sec. 268A(1) of the I.T. Act, instructed that departmental appeals should not be filed before ITAT in such cases. The Circular also applied to pending appeals. The Tribunal observed that the demands in dispute in the Revenue appeals did not exceed the limit set by the CBDT. As a result, the appeals were not maintainable, and the departmental representatives agreed to treat them as not pressed or withdrawn, leading to their dismissal based on the Circular.

Regarding the Cross Objections (COs), the Tribunal noted that under Sec 253(4) of the I.T. Act, the right to COs depended on the survival of corresponding revenue appeals. Since the Revenue appeals were either withdrawn or not pressed, rendering them infructuous, the COs were also deemed not maintainable and thus stood dismissed. Consequently, all the appeals by the Revenue and the COs were dismissed as per the Tribunal's findings and the CBDT Circular.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed all the listed appeals by the Revenue and the corresponding COs due to the non-applicability of the appeals where the demand/tax effect did not exceed Rs. 10 lacs, in accordance with the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015. The judgment highlighted the importance of complying with the Circular's directives and the consequences of non-adherence to the prescribed limits set by the CBDT, leading to the dismissal of the appeals and cross objections in question.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates