2015 (12) TMI 1748

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ari Sahakari Samiti Ltd., Kota., & The ITO, Ward-2 (3), Alwar. Versus Late Sh. Bhim Sen Batra, & The ITO, Ward-1 (2), Jaipur. Versus Sh. Moti Chand Jain, Jaipur., M/s. Gemorium, Jaipur., Sh. Jitendra Kr. Agarwal,. Smt. Jyoti Chug, Jaipur
Income Tax
2015 (12) TMI 1748 - ITAT JAIPUR - TMI
ITAT JAIPUR - AT
Dated:- 18-12-2015
ITA No. 582, 574, 580, 373 460, 351, 106, 473, 101/JP/13 & 37 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Shri Vipin Garg , Shri S.L.Poddar ORDER PER BENCH The above listed appeals are filed by the Revenue (in some case assessee's cross objection as listed above are also filed) against separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)s on different dates for the different assessment years as mentioned above. 2. During the course of hearing of these appeals, Ms. Neena Jeph, JCIT -DR represented department. Th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that it will be applicable to all pending appeals also. 2.2. Subject to some exceptions, it is further directed by CBDT that all the departmental appeals pending before ITAT where the demand/tax effect is not exceeding Rs. 10 lacs should be either withdrawn or not pressed by the departmental representatives at the time of hearing. 2.3 The Revenue appeals listed above are not covered by any excep .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X