1994 (3) TMI 54 - HC - Wealth-tax

Summary

Issues:
- Interpretation of exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for association of persons.
- Justification of setting aside orders regarding exemption by the Tribunal.
- Determination of net wealth and allocation among members of association of persons.
- Application of decision in the case of N. R. Karia [1985] 13 ITD 545.

Analysis:
The case involved a reference under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, regarding the allowability of exemption under section 5(1)(iv) for an association of persons. The Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders disallowing the exemption and referred the matter to the High Court. The issue was whether the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the orders of the authorities below regarding the exemption at the stage of determining net wealth before allocation amongst the members. The High Court analyzed the provisions of the Act and Rules, emphasizing that wealth-tax is payable only by individuals, Hindu undivided families, and companies, not by associations of persons. Therefore, exemption under section 5(1)(iv) must be worked out in the hands of individual members, not the association itself.

The High Court further explained that the interest of an individual in an association of persons is determined as per rule 2 of the Wealth-tax Rules, and the net wealth of the association is calculated based on the Act's provisions. Assets specified in section 5(1) are excluded from the net wealth of individual assessees, not the association. The Court highlighted that an association of persons does not have a legal personality of its own, and the property belongs to the members based on their respective shares. This interpretation was supported by the Bombay High Court's decision in CWT v. Vasudeva V. Dempo [1981] 131 ITR 291.

The High Court referenced the decision in the case of N. R. Karia [1985] 13 ITD 545, where exemption claims were to be granted in the hands of individual members. Since the assessees' claims were not granted in accordance with the law as per the decision in N. R. Karia, the Tribunal rightly set aside the orders and directed fresh disposal. Therefore, the High Court answered the reference in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal's decision.