9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Interpretation of section 79 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding set off of carried forward business losses. 2. Application of section 79 in a case involving change in shareholding and its impact on the claim of set off. Analysis: The case involved the interpretation of section 79 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the entitlement of an assessee-company to claim set off of carried forward business losses against the current year's income. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred two questions to the High Court for opinion. The first question was whether the provisions of section 79 were attracted in the case, and the second question was about the correctness of the Tribunal's finding regarding the applicability of section 79 and the assessee's entitlement to set off losses. The assessee, a private limited company engaged in the business of cutting and processing marble slabs, claimed set off of carried forward business losses against the current year's income. The Income-tax Officer initially rejected the claim due to substantial changes in shareholdings, leading to the application of section 79. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax allowed the claim, considering the circumstances of share transfers between two groups and the absence of evidence suggesting tax liability avoidance. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, stating that section 79 was not applicable due to the absence of a change in shareholding in the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal also noted that the Income-tax Officer had previously allowed a similar claim for set off in a different year. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the High Court in a previous case and the Supreme Court's interpretation of section 79 in another case to support its conclusion. The High Court, considering the settled legal position and the facts of the case, affirmed the Tribunal's decision. It held that section 79 was not attracted as the share transfer occurred in a different year from the assessment year in question, and there was no evidence of the transfer being for tax liability avoidance. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to set off the carried forward business losses against the current year's income. In conclusion, the High Court answered both questions in favor of the assessee, ruling that the provisions of section 79 were not applicable in the case, and the assessee was entitled to the set off of carried forward business losses. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.
|
