Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2010 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (10) TMI 119 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:

1. Violation of section 269SS of the Income Tax Act regarding cash loan.
2. Imposition of penalty under section 271D for alleged violation.
3. Appeal against the penalty order before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
4. Assessment of genuineness of the loan and explanation provided by the assessee.
5. Consideration of the reasonable cause for accepting the deposit in cash.

Analysis:

The case involved an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against a Tribunal order related to the assessment year 1998-99. The assessee had taken a loan in cash from several individuals, leading to the assessing authority imposing a penalty under section 271D for allegedly violating section 269SS of the Act. However, the assessing authority did not doubt the genuineness of the loan and did not make any addition under section 68 of the Act.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) allowed the appeal and deleted the penalty, which was challenged by the revenue before the Tribunal. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, noting that the depositors were agriculturists and the loans were given under emergency circumstances, duly explained before the assessing authority. The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT (Appeals) for deleting the penalty, emphasizing that the assessing authority did not question the genuineness of the loan.

The Tribunal's finding, supported by the CIT (Appeals), established that there was a reasonable cause for accepting the deposit in cash, as per section 273B of the Act. The Tribunal and the CIT (Appeals) accepted the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the reasonable cause, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the penalty. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's decision, ultimately dismissing the appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates