Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2010 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (11) TMI 81 - AT - Service Tax


  1. 2015 (3) TMI 436 - HC
  2. 2024 (7) TMI 755 - AT
  3. 2024 (5) TMI 738 - AT
  4. 2024 (5) TMI 199 - AT
  5. 2024 (4) TMI 232 - AT
  6. 2024 (3) TMI 184 - AT
  7. 2024 (1) TMI 250 - AT
  8. 2024 (1) TMI 138 - AT
  9. 2023 (10) TMI 171 - AT
  10. 2023 (9) TMI 1281 - AT
  11. 2023 (8) TMI 57 - AT
  12. 2023 (8) TMI 348 - AT
  13. 2023 (7) TMI 1021 - AT
  14. 2023 (7) TMI 1019 - AT
  15. 2023 (7) TMI 55 - AT
  16. 2023 (6) TMI 953 - AT
  17. 2023 (5) TMI 340 - AT
  18. 2023 (4) TMI 920 - AT
  19. 2023 (4) TMI 438 - AT
  20. 2023 (2) TMI 946 - AT
  21. 2023 (3) TMI 638 - AT
  22. 2023 (2) TMI 779 - AT
  23. 2023 (2) TMI 1216 - AT
  24. 2023 (3) TMI 570 - AT
  25. 2022 (11) TMI 1043 - AT
  26. 2022 (3) TMI 1259 - AT
  27. 2021 (10) TMI 703 - AT
  28. 2020 (10) TMI 474 - AT
  29. 2020 (4) TMI 343 - AT
  30. 2019 (12) TMI 123 - AT
  31. 2019 (2) TMI 1494 - AT
  32. 2019 (2) TMI 1404 - AT
  33. 2018 (9) TMI 917 - AT
  34. 2018 (9) TMI 1660 - AT
  35. 2018 (7) TMI 620 - AT
  36. 2018 (8) TMI 1509 - AT
  37. 2018 (3) TMI 507 - AT
  38. 2018 (4) TMI 960 - AT
  39. 2018 (2) TMI 647 - AT
  40. 2018 (1) TMI 558 - AT
  41. 2017 (11) TMI 1404 - AT
  42. 2017 (12) TMI 446 - AT
  43. 2017 (10) TMI 404 - AT
  44. 2017 (8) TMI 520 - AT
  45. 2017 (9) TMI 160 - AT
  46. 2017 (7) TMI 798 - AT
  47. 2017 (7) TMI 250 - AT
  48. 2016 (6) TMI 1284 - AT
  49. 2015 (11) TMI 219 - AT
  50. 2015 (3) TMI 748 - AT
  51. 2015 (2) TMI 971 - AT
  52. 2015 (2) TMI 929 - AT
  53. 2014 (12) TMI 705 - AT
  54. 2014 (11) TMI 629 - AT
  55. 2014 (7) TMI 583 - AT
  56. 2014 (5) TMI 648 - AT
  57. 2013 (12) TMI 495 - AT
  58. 2013 (10) TMI 815 - AT
  59. 2013 (8) TMI 418 - AT
  60. 2013 (3) TMI 733 - AT
  61. 2013 (9) TMI 950 - AT
  62. 2013 (8) TMI 262 - AT
  63. 2012 (11) TMI 494 - AT
  64. 2012 (6) TMI 607 - AT
  65. 2012 (7) TMI 26 - AT
  66. 2011 (9) TMI 834 - AT
  67. 2019 (11) TMI 1353 - AAR
  68. 2013 (2) TMI 560 - Commissioner
Issues:
1. Whether the construction services provided by the appellant for the residential quarters fall under the definition of "Construction of Complex" service for service tax liability?
2. Whether the show cause notice issued for service tax liability was time-barred?
3. Whether the contract between the appellant and CPWD should be considered a works contract for VAT payment instead of service tax liability?
4. Whether penalties imposed under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994 are justified?

Issue 1: Construction of Complex Service Liability
The appellant argued that the construction services provided were for the Govt. of India directly, and thus, excluded from the definition of "Construction of Complex" service. The advocate highlighted the definition of "Personal Use" to support the exclusion. The Departmental Representative (DR) contended that the services were not directly provided to the Govt. of India but through CPWD, making the appellant liable for service tax. The tribunal agreed with the appellant, emphasizing that CPWD acted on behalf of the President of India, and the absence of a separate agreement between CPWD and the Income Tax department supported the appellant's case. The tribunal held that the construction was for personal use by the Income Tax department, excluding it from service tax liability.

Issue 2: Time-Barred Show Cause Notice
The appellant argued that a portion of the demand was time-barred as the show cause notice was issued after the service tax period. The tribunal found that even if CPWD was considered a separate entity, the appellant reasonably believed that services to CPWD and the Income Tax department were part of the Govt. of India, justifying the belief that no service tax was payable. The tribunal also noted that the agreement stated the service receiver's liability for any tax, thus rejecting the extended time limit invocation and penalties imposed.

Issue 3: Works Contract vs. Service Tax Liability
The appellant contended that the contract with CPWD should be treated as a works contract, and VAT was paid accordingly, exempting them from service tax liability before a specific date. The tribunal referenced a relevant decision and concluded that construction of a new residential complex under a works contract was not liable for service tax before a certain date, supporting the appellant's argument.

Conclusion
The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the construction services were directly provided to the Govt. of India, falling under the exclusion clause of "Construction of Complex" service. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment highlighted the distinctions between direct service provision to the Govt. of India and the interpretation of relevant definitions and agreements in determining service tax liability and penalties.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates