Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2019 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (2) TMI 1404 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
Classification of services for service tax, applicability of demand notices, benefit of notifications, inclusion of VAT/sales tax in service tax calculation, imposition of interest and penalties, appropriating service tax, calculation errors, abatement under Notification 12/2003-ST, demand related to pure trading activities, demand related to airports and residential complexes, consideration of judicial precedents.

Analysis:
The appellant challenged the Order-in-Original confirming a demand of ?12,06,61,504 under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant argued that the services provided should be classified as 'work contract services' post-01/06/2007, not under 'commercial and industrial construction services' for contracts pre-01/06/2007. They contended that services for non-commercial projects like government buildings, airports, and residential complexes of government employees are not taxable. The appellant claimed denial of benefits under Notification No. 12/2003-ST due to missing sales tax details. They also disputed the imposition of service tax on trading activities and goods sales, which they deemed unconstitutional. The appellant objected to including VAT/sales tax in service tax calculations and contested interest and penalties levied.

The appellant argued that service tax was discharged but not appropriated, leading to an incorrect demand calculation. They claimed that certain demands should be dropped based on judicial decisions and incorrect calculations. The appellant sought the benefit of abatement under Notification 12/2003-ST and challenged the inclusion of VAT/sales tax in service tax calculations. They referenced various judicial precedents to support their arguments.

The Tribunal found infirmities in the impugned order. It noted that services provided by the appellant fall under 'work contract services' taxable post-01/06/2007, warranting the dropping of demands pre-01/06/2007. The Tribunal deemed demands related to pure trading activities, airports, and residential complexes of government employees as unsustainable. It directed the exclusion of material value from taxation under the composition scheme and Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The Tribunal instructed the Adjudicating Authority to reconsider the case, considering appellant's submissions, departmental circulars, and judicial precedents, before passing a new order.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by remanding the case to the Original Authority for a fresh decision following the provided directions and considerations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates