2011 (2) TMI 240 - HC - Income Tax

Deemed income u/s 41(1) - Since, the assessee was formed in the assessment year 1986-87 and succeeded to the transport business from another firm - Section 41(1) of the Act has been amended - It is enforced with effect from April 1, 1993, by the Finance Act, 1992. Now, the word assessee there, includes the successor-in-interest - Held that - after cessation of the liabilities of the years till the assessment year 1984-85 (i.e. prior to formation of the assessee), they could be added in the hands of the predecessor-in-interest of the assessee, who were earlier granted the allowances or deductions and not in the hands of the assessee - Decided against of assessee.

Issues:

1. Assessment of liability under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1986-87.
2. Treatment of liabilities from previous assessment years prior to the formation of the assessee.
3. Application of section 41(1) of the Act regarding remission/cessation of liabilities.
4. Correctness of the decision by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in dismissing the Department's appeal.

Analysis:

1. The appeal in question pertains to an order passed by the income-tax authorities for the assessment year 1986-87 concerning M/s. Uttaranchal Transport, Kanpur. The assessee succeeded a transport business from another firm during the said assessment year.

2. The accounting period for the assessee was from July to the end of June the following year, with the assessment year 1986-87 being treated from July 1, 1984, to March 8, 1986. A liability of Rs. 23,85,609 existed at the beginning of the assessment year, out of which Rs. 6,18,894 pertained to the assessment year 1985-86.

3. The Assessing Officer concluded that the assessee had attempted to defraud the Revenue by obtaining a benefit through remission/cessation of liability. Consequently, the entire remaining liability of Rs. 23,20,769 at the end of the assessment year 1986-87 was added as income under section 41(1) of the Act.

4. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, distinguishing the liabilities and granting relief for Rs. 17,01,875 while remanding the case for further consideration of the remaining liabilities.

5. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), leading to the Department's appeal. The substantial question of law revolved around the correctness of dismissing the Department's appeal despite the cessation of liability in the relevant year.

6. The High Court, after considering precedents, emphasized that liabilities incurred prior to the formation of the assessee could be attributed to the predecessor-in-interest, not the assessee. The court highlighted the absence of provisions holding successors-in-business liable for remitted amounts.

7. Noting the amendments to section 41(1) of the Act post the case's timeline, the court affirmed that the liabilities till the assessment year 1984-85 should be assessed in the hands of the predecessor-in-interest who initially received allowances or deductions, aligning with judicial interpretations.

8. Consequently, the court found no fault in the order, dismissing the appeal on the grounds that the liabilities from previous years should be attributed to the predecessor-in-interest and not the assessee, in accordance with the prevailing legal framework at the time.

← Previous Next →