Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AAR Income Tax - 2011 (5) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (5) TMI 256 - AAR - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the amounts reimbursed by the applicant to GTE-OC are "income" accruing to GTE-OC and liable for tax deduction under section 195 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether the amounts reimbursed qualify as "Fees for Included Services (FIS)" under the Act and the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
3. Whether GTE-OC has a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India under the DTAA and if the amounts received are "business profits" attributable to such PE.
4. If GTE-OC has a PE, whether the taxable income is NIL since the reimbursements are at actuals.
5. The applicable rate of tax deduction at source if the amounts are considered income.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Income Accruing to GTE-OC and Tax Deduction under Section 195
The applicant, VDSI, reimburses GTE-OC for salary and expenses paid to expatriate employees seconded to India. The applicant argued that these payments are mere reimbursements and should not be subject to tax withholding under section 195, as they do not constitute income for GTE-OC. However, the ruling determined that the amounts reimbursed by the applicant represent income accruing to GTE-OC. The reasoning is that the seconded employees remain employees of GTE-OC, and their salaries are paid out of GTE-OC's income. The nature of the payments, despite being labeled as reimbursements, constitutes income for services rendered by GTE-OC to the applicant. Thus, the amounts are subject to tax deduction under section 195. The question was answered in the affirmative.

Issue 2: Qualification as "Fees for Included Services (FIS)"
The applicant contended that the services provided by the seconded employees were managerial and not technical, thus not qualifying as FIS under the DTAA. However, the ruling found that the managerial services rendered by GTE-OC through its employees fall under "fees for included services" as defined in Article 12(4) of the DTAA. The services provided involve managerial control and direction, which are considered consultancy services under the DTAA. The ruling clarified that the make available clause does not apply to managerial services, and thus, the payments are taxable as FIS. The question was answered in the affirmative.

Issue 3 and 4: Permanent Establishment and Business Profits
Since the amounts reimbursed are taxable as FIS, the questions regarding the existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) of GTE-OC in India and whether the amounts received are business profits attributable to such PE became academic. Therefore, no detailed analysis was provided for these issues.

Issue 5: Rate of Tax Deduction at Source
The ruling determined that "Fees for Included Services (FIS)" under Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA are taxable at the rate of 20%. This rate applies to the amounts reimbursed by the applicant to GTE-OC for the services rendered by the seconded employees. The question was answered by specifying the applicable tax rate.

Conclusion:
The ruling concluded that the amounts reimbursed by the applicant to GTE-OC are considered income and are taxable under section 195 of the Act. These amounts qualify as "Fees for Included Services" under the DTAA and are subject to a 20% tax rate. The questions regarding the Permanent Establishment and business profits were deemed academic due to the determination that the payments are taxable as FIS.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates