Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (3) TMI 387 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of interest on temporary investments for exemption under Section 10(23FB).
2. Eligibility of profit on sale of mutual fund units for exemption under Section 10(23FB).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility of Interest on Temporary Investments for Exemption under Section 10(23FB):
The core issue is whether the interest income of Rs. 16,09,900/- earned from temporary investments qualifies for exemption under Section 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) argued that the interest income did not arise from investments in Venture Capital Undertakings (VCUs) and thus, is not exempt under Section 10(23FB). The AO's interpretation was based on the explanation that any income not arising from investment in a VCU is not eligible for exemption.

However, the assessee contended that Section 10(23FB) exempts "any income" of a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) without restricting it to specific sources or types of income. The CIT(A) supported this view, highlighting that the section's language prior to the amendment by the Finance Act, 2007, which took effect from 1st April 2008, did not restrict the exemption to income derived solely from VCUs. The CIT(A) referred to judicial precedents, including the Mumbai Tribunal's decision in Marigold Mezzanine Investment Funds and India Value Fund, which upheld that interest income on fixed deposits earned by a VCF is eligible for exemption under Section 10(23FB).

The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), emphasizing that the amendment restricting the exemption to income from investments in VCUs was prospective and applicable from the Assessment Year 2008-09 onwards. Therefore, for the year under appeal (A.Y. 2006-07), any income of the VCF, including interest on temporary investments, is entitled to exemption under Section 10(23FB).

2. Eligibility of Profit on Sale of Mutual Fund Units for Exemption under Section 10(23FB):
The second issue pertains to whether the profit of Rs. 1,00,91,000/- from the sale of mutual fund units is exempt under Section 10(23FB). The AO denied the exemption, arguing that the mutual fund investments were not surplus funds but were systematically invested, and thus, the profit should be taxed as business income.

The assessee argued that Section 10(23FB) does not restrict the exemption to specific types of income and that the profit from mutual fund units should be exempt as "any income" of the VCF. The CIT(A) concurred, noting that the section's language prior to the amendment did not impose such restrictions and that judicial precedents supported the broader interpretation of "any income."

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, reaffirming that for the relevant assessment year, the exemption under Section 10(23FB) applied to any income of the VCF, including profits from the sale of mutual fund units. The amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2007, which limited the exemption to income from investments in VCUs, was not applicable retrospectively.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that for the Assessment Year 2006-07, the interest on temporary investments and the profit on the sale of mutual fund units are entitled to exemption under Section 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld. The judgment emphasized that the amendments to Section 10(23FB) by the Finance Act, 2007, were prospective and did not apply to the assessment year in question.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates