2010 (12) TMI 707 - AT - Service Tax

Waiver of pre-deposit - Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - chartered accountant s service - Notification No. 15/2002-S.T - As regards the exemption claimed by the assessee, prima facie, the certifications done by the appellant for compliance with the US Law for Satyam Computer Services Limited may get the benefit of Notification No. 59/98-S.T. as amended by 15/2002-S.T. - Stay granted.

Summary

Issues:
1. Stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and Penalty amounts.

Analysis:
The appellant filed a stay petition seeking the waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and Penalty amounts. The demand arose due to alleged non-payment of Service Tax and exceeding the prescribed limits for availing CENVAT Credit. The appellant argued that they exported services to foreign companies and were eligible for certain exemptions under specific notifications. They contended that the remittances to foreign companies should not be classified as recipient services under Chartered Accountants services. Additionally, the appellant claimed that the Service Tax credit was availed from a service provider and not utilized for providing exempted services. The appellant had already deposited a certain amount under the presumption of liability for foreign remittances, which they argued should suffice for the appeal proceedings.

The JCDR reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority regarding the demand of Service Tax and penalties. After considering the submissions from both sides, the Tribunal found that the demands raised appeared to be prima facie related to the export of services. The Tribunal also noted that the appellant's certifications for compliance with US Law for a specific company might qualify for certain exemptions under relevant notifications. However, the Tribunal decided that a detailed examination of the other contentions would be necessary during the final disposal of the appeal. Despite this, the Tribunal deemed the amount deposited by the appellant during the proceedings before the adjudicating authority as sufficient for hearing and disposing of the appeal. Consequently, the application for the waiver of pre-deposit of the remaining amounts was allowed, and the recovery thereof was stayed until the appeal's final disposal.