Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2011 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (8) TMI 516 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 115J of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction of depreciation for arriving at book profits.
2. Revisional proceedings under Section 263 initiated by the Commissioner of Income Tax.
3. Consideration of unabsorbed depreciation and loss in the computation of profit and loss for assessment year 1989-1990.
4. Discrepancy in the treatment of unabsorbed depreciation and loss by the Tribunal and the Revenue.
5. Application of Section 205(1) of the Companies Act in determining carry forward of loss and unabsorbed depreciation.

Issue 1:
The central issue in this case revolves around the interpretation of Section 115J of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically regarding the deduction of depreciation for arriving at book profits. The Tribunal had to determine whether the unabsorbed depreciation of previous years should be deducted for calculating the book profits under Section 115J, even if such depreciation was not carried forward.

Issue 2:
Under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner of Income Tax initiated revisional proceedings, contending that the Assessing Officer's order was prejudicial to the revenue's interest. The Commissioner highlighted discrepancies in the treatment of unabsorbed depreciation and loss, particularly in relation to the balance sheet of the company for the relevant period.

Issue 3:
The assessment year 1989-1990 saw a dispute regarding the consideration of unabsorbed depreciation and loss in the computation of profit and loss. The assessee argued that the unabsorbed depreciation should be deducted in line with Section 115J of the Income Tax Act, 1961, while the Revenue contested this based on the balance sheet's information.

Issue 4:
The Tribunal's decision favored the assessee's position, emphasizing that the depreciation should be deducted as the loss incurred was higher than the depreciation amount. The Tribunal disagreed with the Revenue's interpretation and cited relevant case law to support its decision, leading to the Revenue's appeal against this decision.

Issue 5:
The application of Section 205(1) of the Companies Act was crucial in determining the carry forward of loss and unabsorbed depreciation. The Revenue argued that since there was no loss to be carried forward due to adjustments made in the previous year, the Tribunal erred in accepting the assessee's claim regarding the unabsorbed depreciation.

In conclusion, the High Court of Madras set aside the Tribunal's order, ruling in favor of the Revenue's interpretation based on the balance sheet's information and the absence of unabsorbed loss or depreciation for the relevant year. The Court upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax's direction as being in accordance with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates