Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2011 (1) TMI 851 - AT - Central ExciseDemand Department alleged that appellant directly supply the various bought out items to other party and accordingly demanded for duty was confirmed - As per the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of MIL India Ltd. Vs. CCE, Nodia 2007 -TMI - 1196 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA the powers to remand the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority no longer vests with the Commissioner (A) - Therefore, appeal is allowed by way of remand to Commissioner (Appeals).
Issues Involved: Stay petition for impugned order, remand by Commissioner (A), powers to remand post MIL India Ltd. Vs. CCE judgment
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore involved a stay petition filed by the applicant to stay the operation of the impugned order. The Tribunal noted that the appeal itself could be disposed of at that juncture. Upon careful consideration of submissions and records, it was observed that the Commissioner (A) had remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority. However, the Tribunal pointed out that post the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in MIL India Ltd. Vs. CCE, Nodia, the powers to remand no longer rested with the Commissioner (A). Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner (A) for a decision within the available records, with a specific direction to grant an opportunity of personal hearing to the assessee. The impugned order was thus set aside, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand to the Commissioner (Appeals). ---
|