Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2010 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2010 (11) TMI 761 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the objects in the memorandum of association of a society/trust are conclusive proof of such a trust existing solely as an educational institution entitled for the benefits under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether registration under section 43 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987) is a condition precedent for seeking approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. Whether the certificate issued by the Commissioner of Endowments under section 43 of the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987 is conclusive proof of an assessee being a charitable institution existing solely for the purpose of education.
4. Whether the Commissioner of Income-tax can refuse approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, even if the assessee produces a certificate of registration under section 43 of the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Objects in the Memorandum of Association
The court examined whether the objects in the memorandum of association of a society/trust are conclusive proof of such a trust existing solely as an educational institution entitled for the benefits under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. The court noted that the emphasis in section 10(23C)(vi) is on the word "solely," meaning exclusively and not primarily. The court held that in cases where approval is initially sought, the objects in the memorandum of association are conclusive proof of the trust existing solely as an educational institution entitled for the benefits under section 10(23C)(vi). However, for renewal applications, the prescribed authority must also examine whether the income has been applied solely for educational purposes.

Issue 2: Registration under A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987
The court addressed whether registration under section 43 of the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987 is a condition precedent for seeking approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that registration under the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987 is not a condition precedent for seeking approval under section 10(23C)(vi). However, the Chief Commissioner can prescribe registration under the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987 as a condition subject to which approval is granted.

Issue 3: Certificate of Registration as Conclusive Proof
The court examined whether the certificate issued by the Commissioner of Endowments under section 43 of the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987 is conclusive proof of an assessee being a charitable institution existing solely for the purpose of education. The court held that the certificate is but one of the factors and not conclusive proof. The Chief Commissioner must independently examine the objects of the applicant-society and satisfy himself that the institution exists solely for educational purposes and not for profit.

Issue 4: Refusal of Approval Despite Certificate of Registration
The court addressed whether the Commissioner of Income-tax can refuse approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, even if the assessee produces a certificate of registration under section 43 of the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987. The court held that the Chief Commissioner can refuse approval if, after examining the objects and the application, he is not satisfied that the institution exists solely for educational purposes and not for profit.

Separate Judgments:
The court examined several writ petitions separately, addressing specific grounds for rejection in each case. For instance, in W.P. No. 12946 of 2010, the court found that the object of publishing journals and magazines for the promotion of education is incidental and ancillary to the primary object of running an educational institution. In W.P. No. 15870 of 2010, the court upheld the rejection on the ground that funds were advanced to another society, which is not considered an application of income solely for educational purposes.

Conclusion:
The court dismissed W.P. Nos. 12254, 12374, 15870, 21248, 21251, 21257, and 21266 of 2010. For the remaining writ petitions, the court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax for fresh consideration. The Chief Commissioner was directed to pass orders afresh, prescribing registration under the A. P. Act No. 30 of 1987 as a condition for granting approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act, if deemed appropriate.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates