Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (4) TMI 850 - AT - Central Excise


Issues: Classification of the product "Preventol NP" - fungicide or preservative under Chapter Heading 38.08.10 or 38.08.90.

Analysis:
The appellate tribunal, consisting of Hon'ble Ms. JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, Vice-President, and Hon'ble Dr. CHITTARANJAN SATAPATHY, Technical Member, addressed the issue of classification of the product "Preventol NP" in the present appeal. The main contention was whether the product should be classified as a fungicide under Chapter Heading 38.08.10, as claimed by the assessees and upheld by the lower authorities, or as a preservative under Chapter Heading 38.08.90, as claimed by the Revenue.

After hearing both sides, the tribunal noted that the adjudicating authority had accepted the assessee's classification based on various factors. These factors included the HSN Explanatory Notes on fungicides, a test report from the Chemical Examiner, and an explanation provided by the CLRI, Chennai. The Commissioner (Appeals) also supported the findings, and the department failed to challenge the conclusion that the product should be classified as a fungicide under Chapter Heading 38.08.10.

The tribunal further elaborated that "Preventol NP" functions as a chemical agent to protect against microorganisms like fungi, bacteria, and molds. Since the product is used before the attack by microorganisms, it can be classified as a protective fungicide. The tribunal emphasized that all actions such as preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating the causes of deterioration of leather by microorganisms serve the purpose of a fungicide.

Based on the evidence and reasoning presented, the tribunal found no justification to interfere with the lower authorities' decision. Therefore, the tribunal upheld the impugned order and dismissed the appeal. The judgment was dictated and pronounced in open court, settling the classification issue of the product "Preventol NP" as a fungicide under Chapter Heading 38.08.10.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates