Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2011 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (8) TMI 623 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Whether the cost of drawing and designs supplied by the customer is to be included in the assessable value or not.

Analysis:
The appeals were filed by the Revenue regarding the inclusion of drawing and designs costs provided by customers in the assessable value of manufactured M.V. Parts. The Range Supdt. considered these expenses as 2% of the assessable value, leading to show-cause notices for demanding differential duty, interest, and penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. The Commissioner(Appeals) relied on previous decisions and set aside the adjudication order, allowing the appeals of the respondents. The Revenue appealed against this decision.

Argument by Revenue:
The Revenue argued that the drawing and designs supplied by customers, even if free of cost, incurred expenses for the respondents, which should be included in the assessable value. Thus, the impugned order should be set aside.

Decision and Reasoning:
Despite no representation from the respondents, the Tribunal reviewed the cross-objections and decided to proceed without their presence. Citing precedents like CCE, Pune vs M/s. Bharat Forge Ltd. and CCE, Pune vs. Luna Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal held that the cost of drawing and designs incurred by customers should not be included in the assessable value of goods supplied by the manufacturer. Following the decisions of the co-ordinate Bench, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, stating no merits were found. The cross-objections were also disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates