9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of professional fees from a foreign company when permission from the Reserve Bank of India was not obtained by the assessee? Analysis: The case involved a reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1980-81. The assessee had forgone professional fees from a foreign company due to financial crisis and without obtaining permission from the Reserve Bank of India. The Income-tax Officer added the amount to the income of the assessee for not obtaining the required permission. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that lack of permission from the Reserve Bank of India could not be a bar against the allowance of the claim. The Tribunal upheld this decision, referring to similar cases in the past where forgone fees were not considered as real income. The Tribunal also considered the method of accounting followed by the assessee and remanded the matter for further determination. The Tribunal's decision was challenged, arguing that the Reserve Bank of India did not allow the assessee to forgo the fees, and the cash basis accounting method was not clearly established. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) observed that if the assessee maintained accounts on a cash basis and did not credit the income, there was no justification for including it in the total income. The Tribunal for the assessment year 1983-84 considered the issue, noting that the Reserve Bank's refusal to allow the forgone fees changed the factual position. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clarity on the accounting method used by the assessee and remanded the matter for further assessment. The High Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, found that the method of accounting followed by the assessee for recording the remuneration receivable needed further examination. The Court answered the question in the negative but remanded the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the accounting method and the taxability issue. The Court directed the Tribunal to allow a reasonable opportunity for hearing and the submission of fresh evidence, emphasizing the importance of clarity in determining the method of accounting. In conclusion, the High Court remanded the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on the method of accounting followed by the assessee for recording the remuneration receivable from the foreign company. The Court highlighted the need for clarity and directed a reexamination of the issue to determine the taxability based on the accounting method used by the assessee.
|
