9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The application involves the interpretation of section 43B of the Income-tax Act regarding the deduction of taxes and duties, specifically in relation to the treatment of sales tax amounts remaining unpaid by a certain date. Interpretation of Section 43B: The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax added a sum to the assessment for the year 1984-85, citing section 43B due to unpaid sales tax and central sales tax amounts. Section 43B mandates that a deduction for any sum payable by the assessee as tax or duty shall be allowed only when actually paid, regardless of the year in which the liability was incurred. Assessee's Argument: The petitioner contended that section 43B should only apply if the assessee claims deduction for the payable tax or duty, which was not the case here. Citing a decision from the Allahabad High Court, the petitioner argued against the addition made by the Income-tax Officer. Precedent and Analysis: Referring to a similar case, it was established that if the assessee did not claim the disputed amount as a deduction or charge it to the profit and loss account, there should be no disallowance or "add back." This aligns with the interpretation that section 43B is triggered only when the deduction is claimed for the payable tax or duty. Revenue's Argument: The respondents argued that the taxes collected by the assessee should be included as income under section 28 of the Income-tax Act, based on precedents where sales tax amounts were considered part of business receipts and subject to deduction upon payment to the government. Court's Decision: The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the addition made by the Income-tax Officer under section 43B. The judgment emphasized that section 43B applies when the assessee claims deduction for payable taxes, and the treatment of sales tax as business receipts was not the primary issue in this case.
|
