Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1991 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (9) TMI 24 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved: Validity of notice under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1982-83.

Summary:
The petitioner, a partnership firm, received a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1982-83. Subsequently, an assessment order was passed by the assessing authority. Upon appeal, the first appellate authority remanded the case back to the assessing authority. The petitioner then appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, arguing that the initiation of proceedings under section 148 was without jurisdiction. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the notice served was illegal as the reasons were not on record. The Commissioner of Income-tax's reference application was rejected, and the legal position declared by the Tribunal prevailed. Another notice under section 147 was issued for the same assessment year, addressing the earlier defect. The petitioner challenged this notice in a writ petition.

The petitioner contended that the second notice under section 147 was not sustainable due to the existence of the first notice under section 148. However, the court disagreed, stating that the Tribunal's final order rendered the first notice without jurisdiction. Referring to a Division Bench decision, the court clarified that since the Tribunal found the initial proceedings under section 147 to be without jurisdiction, they were not considered pending. The court noted that the second notice was served after the first proceedings were declared without jurisdiction, making the earlier proceedings non-subsisting. Ultimately, the writ petition was dismissed with costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates