9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 269UC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding alienation of property by co-owners under one deed exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs but individual shares not exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs. Analysis: The judgment addresses the question of whether the provisions of section 269UC of the Income-tax Act are applicable when several co-owners convey a property under one deed, with the total value exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs but individual shares not exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs. The contention raised is that since the property is conveyed under one deed, the provisions of Chapter XXC, specifically section 269UC, are attracted. However, the court emphasizes that each co-owner has the right to sell their share independently, and the consent of other co-owners is not required. Therefore, for the purpose of section 269UC, the value of each co-owner's share must be considered, not the total value of the property. This interpretation aligns with the general law recognizing plurality of ownership. The court refers to the decision in K. V. Kishore's case, where a similar scenario was considered. In that case, it was established that each co-owner had the right to transfer their definite share in the property individually. The court in Kishore's case concluded that the value of each share being less than Rs. 10 lakhs, the provisions of section 269UC were not applicable. This decision is in line with the principle that the value of the property of a person making a transfer should be considered for the application of section 269UC. Additionally, the judgment mentions a similar case under the Gift-tax Act where two co-owners gifted a property under one deed. The Supreme Court held that each co-owner made a gift of their share individually, even though the gift was conveyed through a single document. This decision reinforces the concept that joint ownership does not alter the individual rights of co-owners to transfer their specific shares. Furthermore, the court highlights a case involving section 230A of the Income-tax Act, where heirs sold their respective shares under one deed, with each share valued below Rs. 2 lakhs. It was held that section 230A was not attracted as the value of each share did not exceed the prescribed limit. This case supports the interpretation that for tax implications, the value of individual shares should be considered, not the combined value of shares transferred under one deed. In conclusion, the judgment affirms that under section 269UC of the Income-tax Act, the value of each co-owner's share should be taken into account when determining the applicability of the provisions, even when multiple co-owners convey the property under one deed.
|
